Clarius PAL HD3 review
PAL HD3 basic scanner operation; optional Essentials PW/AI tools excluded from this score.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
AZNO comparison desk
Handheld ultrasound comparison.
Side by side.
Choose up to three models. Compare the price, the actual configuration and the details behind the score — all in one place.
01 / Build your shortlist
Choose your models
3 of 3 selected
Replace a selection to compare another device. Each model can appear once; leave a slot empty to compare only two.
Selections update the table immediately. The initial three models are an example, not a ranking.
02 / Compare the details
Same criteria. Clearer differences.
Scroll within the table for more rows. On smaller screens, swipe sideways; the criterion column stays in view. 20 of 20 comparison items shown.
| What matters Source-based buying context | Mindray TE Air e5MPhoto on manufacturer page Mindray TE Air e5MApprox. $4,499 starting hardware price |  Philips Lumify L12-4Approx. US$6,000 for one new L12-4 |  Butterfly iQ3Approx. US$3,899 hardware |
|---|---|---|---|
| Package & ownership | |||
| Exact reviewed configuration | e5M wireless probe with linear/convex formats and the documented Smart tools; compatible host additional. | One L12-4 linear transducer; iOS host/power arrangement used for the indicative runtime. | iQ3 with US Advanced Technology imaging/automated tools enabled, not Core alone. |
| Approximate price / quoteHardware references, not delivered AZNO offers. | Approx. $4,499 starting hardware pricePrice source / quote → | Approx. US$6,000 for one new L12-4Price source / quote → | Approx. US$3,899 hardwarePrice source / quote → |
| Region & package scope | North America storefront; the card uses $, without an explicit currency label. Confirm currency and destination eligibility. | US distributor reference, not a Philips factory quote. Listing was sold out on the check date; availability is not promised. | US individual manufacturer pricing. Required software and host are separate. |
| Software & extra costs | No associated probe subscription in the North American FAQ. Host and separately listed accessories are additional. | iOS accessory kit listed separately at US$399; hardware subtotal US$6,399 before the host, tax and delivery. Confirm current compatibility. | Advanced: US$420/year or US$1,500 one-time with five years of guaranteed access. Initial hardware + annual Advanced: US$4,319. Core is US$299/year but does not cover the scored Advanced kit. |
| Evidence date | October 13, 2026 · check current regional quote and configuration | October 13, 2026 · check current regional quote and configuration | October 13, 2026 · check current regional quote and configuration |
| Imaging & technology | |||
| Supplied imaging formats | Two selectable format families: linear and convex.Source → | One supplied linear format; other Lumify probes excluded.Source → | Linear, convex and phased formats on one scanner.Source → |
| Imaging / Doppler capabilities | B, M, color, power and PW documented.Source → | 2D, M-mode and color documented. No unsupported PW claim for this kit.Source → | B, M, color, power and PW with the specified Advanced entitlement.Source → |
| Processing & smart toolsFeature presence is not measured accuracy. | Smart Bladder, Smart Calc and PW Auto Calc documented; regional entitlement must match.Source → | XRES, harmonic imaging and SonoCT documented.Source → | Advanced includes Auto Bladder/Auto B-Lines and imaging tools; country/version restrictions apply.Source → |
| Battery & portability | |||
| Probe-only weightDisplays, cables and accessories can add mass. | 229 ±3 g, probe only; host/case excluded.Source → | 108 g without cable in the March 2020 specification; current revision requires confirmation.Source → | 300 g probe; host and charger excluded.Source → |
| Scanning / host runtimeDifferent workloads; not a laboratory endurance ranking. | 90–120 min mixed-use B-mode claim; score uses 90 min. Not an all-mode endurance test.Source → | iOS page states 2–5 h; uses the lower 120 min. Battery-free probe: host/accessory runtime, not internal-probe battery.Source → | Up to two hours: a manufacturer maximum, not guaranteed continuous runtime.Source → |
| Battery / power arrangement | 3.85 V, 1650 mAh, according to the Rev 2.0 datasheet. | The L12-4 transducer is battery-free; system energy comes from the host/power arrangement. | 2220 mAh lithium-ion; manufacturer lists the battery as non-replaceable. |
| Charging specification | 0–90% in 35 minutes under the specified fast-charge conditions, including 10–26°C and a temperature-equilibrated probe. | No L12-4 battery to recharge. Plan charging for the supported phone/tablet and, for iOS, the Lumify power module. | 10–90% in 90 minutes; do not compare it with a competitor's 0–90% result as if the tests were identical. |
| Typical scanning power (W)Capacity and maximum output are not measured consumption. | Average scanning power in watts not established by the sources used; battery capacity is not power consumption. | Typical scanning draw in watts not verified in this review. Do not derive it from the published runtime. | Typical operating draw in watts not verified. No wattage ranking is inferred from capacity or maximum runtime. |
| AZNO shared rubric v2 | |||
| Editorial score / 10Documented features and portability, not image quality or best-buy value. | 8.2/10Calculation & evidence → | 7.0/10Calculation & evidence → | 8.7/10Calculation & evidence → |
| Assessed evidence coverageLow-coverage totals should not be ranked against fully assessed devices. | 100% assessed | 100% assessed | 100% assessed |
| Supplied imaging formats · 20% | 8.0/10 | 5.0/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Imaging and Doppler functions · 25% | 8.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Processing and smart tools · 20% | 10.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Indicative scanning runtime · 20% | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Probe-only weight · 15% | 8.0/10 | 10.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
Keep the caveats visible. Runtime claims have different workloads; host-powered figures are not internal-probe endurance. A low-evidence score is not proof of poorer imaging. Read the full review and demonstrate the exact quoted kit.
Photo sources and exact-model notes
Mindray TE Air e5M
No republished photo in the reviewed record. See the manufacturer's exact-model page.
Philips Lumify L12-4
Lumify L12-4 appears in panel A of this 2022 study figure; original clinical-use image, not an AZNO product test or treatment recommendation. © 2022 Johnson C. Y. Pang, Amy S. N. Fu, Stanley K. H. Lam, B. Peng and Allan C. L. Fu; PLOS ONE, Figure 3, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0274990.
Original photo source · CC BY 4.0. No endorsement of AZNO implied.
Butterfly iQ3
Photo: Finch et al., Figure 1; University Photography team. CC BY 4.0. Image extracted unchanged; simulation setting, not an AZNO product test or endorsement. Edward Finch, Jun Jie Lim, Samuel Birks, Ansaam El-Sherif, Stephen Cross, Jamie Sterland and Deborah Clark; University Photography team; The Clinical Teacher, Figure 1, DOI 10.1111/tct.70320
Original photo source · CC BY 4.0. No endorsement of AZNO implied.
Go beyond the comparison table
Read the exact-model handheld ultrasound reviews.
Use the same criteria across models, then read the evidence and configuration limits before deciding what to ask a supplier. The order below is a navigation list, not a performance ranking.
Youkey Q7 + L11-4Ks review
Q7 body plus one L11-4Ks linear head; other interchangeable heads excluded.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
GE HealthCare Vscan Air SL review
SL sector/linear base probe; optional Caption AI and other paid tools excluded.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
Konted C10CX review
C10CX linear probe, not C10CX PRO or C10UL. Delivered revision needs confirmation.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
Sonoscanner U-Lite PRO review
Dedicated display plus Linear Array Full HD 6–18 MHz, 50 mm transducer; other optional probes excluded.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
Mindray TE Air e5M review
e5M wireless probe with linear/convex formats and the documented Smart tools; compatible host additional.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
Philips Lumify L12-4 review
One L12-4 linear transducer; iOS host/power arrangement used for the indicative runtime.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
Butterfly iQ3 review
iQ3 with US Advanced Technology imaging/automated tools enabled, not Core alone.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
GE HealthCare Vscan Air CL review
CL curved/linear base probe and base processing; compatible host additional. Optional subscriptions excluded.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
EchoNous Kosmos Mobile review
Torso-One iOS/tablet kit with required Doppler and AI entitlements enabled; Lexsa and optional Link excluded.
Read documented features, weight and runtime context, dated price information and the limits of available user feedback.
Handheld ultrasound buying value
What is included in the price you are comparing?
Match the region, currency, exact probe configuration, host device, software entitlement and accessories. Compare the same ownership period where recurring software is involved. Prices in these reviews are dated source references, not an AZNO inventory offer or a claim that every capability is included.
Probe-only weight excludes the rest of the kit. Runtime depends on the workload and host arrangement; a battery-capacity figure is not measured operating consumption. Use the table's unknown values as questions to resolve, not as zeroes or assumed defects.
Compare complete supplier offers, or use ultrasound probe sourcing when a reviewed configuration matches your requirements.
Handheld ultrasound comparison questions
Which handheld ultrasound has the best image quality?
This page does not establish a clinically tested winner. The reviews separate manufacturer specifications, attributed public comments and AZNO purchasing analysis. Request a suitable evaluation of the exact configuration for your intended workflow rather than treating an editorial feature score as measured image quality.
Can I compare wired and wireless handheld ultrasound devices?
Yes. Start with the supplied formats, host compatibility, enabled modes, cable or battery arrangement and full kit cost. “Wireless” alone does not establish better image quality, battery endurance or buying value.
Why is an approximate price sometimes unavailable?
A comparable public quote may not be verified for that exact region and kit. The table marks missing information rather than inventing a price or copying the amount from a different revision or accessory.
Read the numbers correctly
The same questions. Not the same clinical job.
Start with your use case. A dedicated linear probe and a multi-format scanner are not interchangeable clinical recommendations. Match the examinations, enabled modes, display and workflow before choosing.
Compare full package cost. Public hardware prices are dated regional references. Add the host, required software, accessories, tax, delivery and service. A body-only figure is not a complete kit.
Know the score's limits. The rubric uses formats 20%, modes 25%, processing/tools 20%, runtime 20% and probe weight 15%. Unassessed criteria are excluded; the weighted score is normalized by assessed coverage. It is not tested image quality, diagnostic accuracy or a best-buy rating.